_____________________________________________________________
4 -
Frederick David Tombe
Abstract.
Maxwell's 1861 paper "On Physical Lines of Force" is interpreted.
An improvement is proposed that involves replacing his molecular
vortices with rotating electron-positron dipoles. These dipoles will each
comprise of an electron and a positron undergoing a mutual orbit. Electromagnetism
is then explained in terms of an electric sea in which magnetic lines
of force are physically comprised of helical springs created out of rotating
electron-positron dipoles. The electron-positron dipoles are bonded together
in a double helix pattern and the resulting helical springs form elliptical
or circular solenoidal hoops around an electric current circuit or a
bar magnet.
Equation 77 in Maxwell's 1861 paper, is the Lorentz
force...
* James Clerk-Maxwell published his paper "On Physical
Lines of Force" in 1861 in the
Philosophical Magazine:
http://vacuum-physics.com/Maxwell/maxwell_oplf.pdf
First version in this Forum: 1st April 2006
- Second extended version: 10th
April 2006
New revised version: 25th June 2007:
Michelson-Morley and the Entrained Electric Sea
New revised version: 21th February 2008
Abstract.
Maxwell's 1861 paper "On Physical Lines of Force"
is interpreted. An improvement is proposed that involves replacing his
molecular vortices with rotating electron-positron dipoles. These dipoles
will each comprise of an electron and a positron undergoing a mutual
orbit. Electromagnetism is then explained in terms of an electric sea in
which magnetic lines of force are physically comprised of helical springs
created out of rotating electron-positron dipoles. The electron-positron
dipoles are bonded together in a double helix pattern and the resulting
helical springs form elliptical or circular solenoidal hoops around an
electric current circuit or a bar magnet.
New revised version: 18th July 2008
- - - - -
22nd August 2008: This paper has been
totally withdrawn (together with paper I)
, for the reason that it centres around a theory which attempts to rationalize
inertial mass as being related to the sum of the "modulus" of the electric
charge in a body. More recently, I have been working on a different principle
as explained in the paper at N2 entitled "Negative Mass and the Gravity Sink".
The ideas contained in this paper concerning inertial mass were
only peripheral to the main theme regarding an electron-positron luminiferous
medium. These ideas concerning inertial mass have now been superseded
by a new theory which involves absolute values as opposed to 'modulus'
values of charge
.
(We maintain nevertheless a copy of the paper for history's sake.)
Abstract.
PART 1
A unified derivation
of Newton's law of gravitation, and
Coulomb's law of electrostatics, demonstrates
charge to be a property associated with acceleration,
and inertial mass to be a measure of the
amount of matter in a body. It also demonstrates
inertial mass to have an effect on acceleration in relation
to electrostatic forces, but not in relation to gravitational
forces. The derivation demonstrates from first principles that
electrostatics and gravitation are mathematically parallel,
despite this apparent difference between them. Einstein was aware
that the acceleration of a body under gravity is independent of
its inertial mass, but his interpretation of
this fact, which led to his General Theory
of Relativity, is called into question.
PART 2
Maxwell's displacement
current is considered. Attention
is drawn to the close association between
Maxwell's displacement current and Coulomb's law of electrostatics.
It is concluded that an electromagnetic force must ultimately
be an electrostatic force in origin, when examined at
the microscopic level, and that this can only be possible
by introducing an elastic aether comprised of electrons and positrons.
Electromagnetism is the manifestation of stresses and strains in
the aether, whereas the forces acting between
the particles of the aether are electrostatic. The force
acting on a charged particle moving in a magnetic field,
which we will refer to as 'The Lorentz Force',
is then considered. The Lorentz Force is incorporated into
Maxwell's equations, leading to a slight modification in the latter.
This modification involves replacing the partial time derivatives
with total time derivatives, and therefore removing
any ambiguity about which frame of reference Maxwell's
equations are valid in. They are valid in the geocentric
aether rest frame. Maxwell's equations do not, as is customarily
believed, give any credence whatsoever to Einstein's postulate
of the constancy of the speed of light.
- - - - -
June 2006 - A new very interesting contribution
towards a critical analysis of Maxwell's work,
and an aether grounded theoretical description
of electromagnetic interactions:
Abstract.
Maxwell's 1864 paper 'A Dynamical Theory
of the Electromagnetic Field' abandons the theory
of molecular vortices that was a central feature
of his 1861 paper 'On Physical Lines of Force'.
Even after writing part I of his 1861 paper, Maxwell realized
that a purely hydrodynamical approach to electromagnetic
theory is insufficient, and so he introduced electrical
particles and gradually shifted over to a more dynamical
approach. This article investigates whether or not any
physics was lost as a result of Maxwell abandoning his theory
of molecular vortices. The focus of attention is centred
on equation (5) of his 1861 paper, as this equation contains
components that can be demonstrated to simultaneously
represent both the Coriolis force and the Lorentz force,
therefore implying that the Lorentz force is a kind
of Coriolis force. Since a rotating frame of reference is
needed for a Coriolis force, it follows that the Lorentz
force must depend entirely on the rotating aethereal substance
within Maxwell's vortex cells. The conclusion is that Maxwell
made a serious error when he abandoned his theory of molecular
vortices, and that the physical explanation for the Lorentz
force was lost as a result.
- - - - -
July 2006 - Two new papers by F.D. Tombe, suggesting original
connections between aether, gravity and electromagnetic interactions.
Abstract.
Experimental evidence suggests,
that when a torque is applied to
a spinning gyroscope, perpendicularly
to the axis of spin, an induced
torque is generated that is mutually perpendicular
to the direction of spin, and to the direction
of the applied torque. This induced gyroscopic torque
exhibits the characteristics of the motion of a charged
particle in a magnetic field. Applied mathematics textbooks
attempt to explain gyroscopic torque entirely within the
context of Newtonian mechanics, and there is no official recognition
of the existence of any additional induced forces.
This article examines the limitations of Newton's law of gravitation
and proposes a more general extension based on hydrodynamical
principles. It is shown that gravity involves three additional
components that are not catered for by Newton's law
of gravitation. These three components link gravity directly
with electromagnetism. It is concluded that there exists
strong evidence to suggest that gravity and negative
electricity are exactly the same phenomenon, and that
like poles only repel when they are positive.
(Revised version: October 2006)
New revised version January 2008:
Experimental evidence suggests that when a torque is
applied to a spinning gyroscope such that the torque axis
is perpendicular to the spin axis, then an induced torque will
be generated in the gyroscope that is mutually perpendicular to
both the spin axis, and to the applied torque axis. This induced
gyroscopic torque exhibits the three way mutually perpendicular
characteristics of the motion of a charged particle in a magnetic
field. Applied mathematics textbooks do not however recognize
the existence of induced gyroscopic torque as a distinct fundamental
force in its own right. Textbooks assume that when a spinning gyroscope
appears to be defying gravity, that this can be fully explained without
having to recognize the existence of any additional forces beyond downward
Newtonian gravity and upward normal reaction of a surface. This article
proposes a general theory of gravity based on hydrodynamical principles
which introduces three additional components that are not catered
for by Newton's law of gravitation. These three components link gravity
directly with electromagnetism as well as fully accounting for the induced
gyroscopic force in terms of the Coriolis force.
[The paper "Gravity is Negative Electricity (A Theory of
mutually Attracting Sinks)" has been replaced with
this new one (27th Nov. 2006). ]
New revised version: 1st February 2007.
Abstract.
Most students of physics and chemistry are familiar
with the law that 'Like Electric Charges Repel'. It will
now be proposed that in the case of negative electric
charges, that this mutual repulsion can be explained
by a mechanism involving centrifugal force acting laterally
between solenoidal field lines in the polarized
electric sea, and that this mechanism is overriding an underlying
hydrodynamical force of mutual attraction. Aether hydrodynamics
tells us that sinks should mutually attract each other. If
we equate negatively charged particles with sinks, this will
explain both gravity and atomic bonding, providing that we assume
all atomic and molecular matter to contain a net negative charge.
The Earth's magnetic field can then be explained by virtue of
the fact that the Earth is a rotating negatively charged object.
There will hence be two opposing forces acting between
negatively charged bodies. There will be a hydrodynamical
force of mutual attraction and a polarization
force of mutual centrifugal repulsion. If the repulsive
centrifugal mechanism is dominant at close range, a
graph demonstrating the sum of these two forces will
have the exact same shape as the graph that illustrates the
inter atomic bonding force. There will be a mutually repulsive
force at short range and a mutually attractive force at long
range that tapers off to zero.
[Note of the Editor
: As far as the following assertion is concerne
d: «the Earth's magnetic field is
explained by virtue of the fact that the Earth is a rotating negatively
charged object» , the reader could be interested
even in the paper presented in next point 8.]
[This is a new revised version of the paper
E (19th Nov. 2007). We kept both versions since
in the first one it appears the interesting remark about
a possible source for Earth's magnetic field, see the previous
Note of the Editor...]
- - - - -
Abstract.
It is proposed that the orbital electrons of an
atom should be replaced by a much more complicated interaction of
rotating electron pairs and rotating electron-positron dipole pairs.
This scenario may better explain both magnetic spin moment and electric
current inside atomic and molecular matter. Rotating dipoles can
act as a source of stored kinetic energy by virtue of magnetization
and linear polarization, and the associated solenoidal bonding can provide
a link from the orbital electrons through to the magnetic field beyond.
The link between electric current and magnetic fields
will be explored by reviewing Maxwell's cogwheel/idle wheel mechanism
in terms of mutually orbiting pairs.
It will then be speculated that a magnetic field acts
like a rotationally elastic sponge that soaks up the large scale
vorticity of Descartes' universe.
25th February 2007: This is a new augmented
revised version of the paper previously published with
the title: "The Epicycle Theory of the Atom".
19th May 2007:
New revised version.
30th April 2008: New revised version.
- - - - -
October 2006 - New interesting contributions from F.D.
Tombe.
Abstract.
The rotating electron-positron dipole is the primary
physical unit of electromagnetism. It consists of an electron in a mutual
central force orbit with a positron. The axis of rotation of this rotating
dipole is perpendicular to a line joining the electron to the positron.
Aether flows out of the positron, crosses over, and sinks down into the
electron. This results in a swirling aether vortex with the electron and
the positron acting in the capacity of rolling idle wheels. The richness
and quality of this prototype unit will now be discussed in terms of the
manifestation of ten very important and distinctive physical characteristics.
Abstract.
It is proposed that space is a dynamic aethereal
medium of unknown substance in which electrons constitute sinks, and
in which positrons constitute sources. Negative and positive electric charge
is merely a measure of the rate of flow of the aether into the sinks and
out of the sources. Standard hydrodynamical theory indicates that this arrangement
not only accounts for the irrotational radial flow (inverse square law force)
of aether into electrons and out of positrons, but that it also yields
three additional components of force. These three additional components
are the centrifugal force ω²r associated with radial repulsion,
the Coriolis force vXH associated with gyroscopes and motion in a vortex,
and the rotational angular force ∂A/∂t that is associated with
electromagnetic induction and electromagnetic radiation.
It is then explained how electromagnetism is a particular
manifestation of these four forces that arises when we have a densely
packed sea of rotating electron-positron dipoles. Each dipole will contain
an aethereal vortex due to the flow of aether across from the positron
to the electron. When the dipoles are aligned along their axial planes, such
that their vorticity vectors H (curl A = H) form solenoidal field lines,
this will effectively render the entire vicinity into a rotating frame
of reference on the large scale. This will invoke the Coriolis force on
moving charged particles and it will lead to both the Lorentz force and
to Weber’s law of electrodynamics. This renders the rotating electron-positron
dipole into the role of being the DNA of electromagnetism. Space is densely
packed with these tiny dielectric vortices which are many orders of magnitude
smaller than the size of an average atom.
New revised version: 28th January 2007.
22nd August 2008: This paper has been
totally withdrawn (together with paper B)
, for the reason that it centres around a theory which attempts to rationalize
inertial mass as being related to the sum of the "modulus" of the electric
charge in a body. More recently, I have been working on a different principle
as explained in the paper at N2 entitled "Negative Mass and the Gravity Sink".
The ideas contained in this paper concerning inertial mass were
only peripheral to the main theme regarding an electron-positron luminiferous
medium. These ideas concerning inertial mass have now been superseded
by a new theory which involves absolute values as opposed to 'modulus'
values of charge, and the theories concerning centrifugal force
and Coriolis force contained within this paper have been expanded
upon in the paper at Q2 entitled "The Cause of Centrifugal Force"
.
(We maintain nevertheless a copy of the paper for history's sake.)
Abstract.
It is proposed that space is a liquid aethereal
medium of unknown substance, in which electrons
constitute sinks, and in which positrons constitute sources.
Electric charge is merely a measure of the rate of flow
of the aether into the sinks and out of the sources. Two
sinks will attract each other, two sources will repel each other,
whereas a sink and a source will either repel or attract each
other depending on which has got the greater charge. Mass is not
involved in the hydrodynamics of elementary particles, while
spin is a quantity directly related to aether vorticity. It
will be shown that mass is a cumulative quantity which arises in
systems of particles, and that it can act as a retarding factor
when an applied force acts on that system.
New revised version: 20th July 2007.
Abstract.
Dan Bernoulli's principle concerns the conservation
of hydrostatic pressure and kinetic energy density
in a fluid. It is essentially a special case of the
law of conservation of mechanical energy. It is commonly
accepted that the hydrostatic pressure term is linked
to irrotational potential energy. Maxwell however demonstrated
that the hydrostatic term can be divided into an irrotational
term and a microscopic centrifugal pressure term of the
same basic form as the kinetic energy density term
on the large scale. This centrifugal pressure arises due
to the mutual tangential motion of the particles comprising
the fluid. Maxwell went on to demonstrate that a centrifugal
pressure gradient accounts for the force which acts on unmagnetized
magnetic materials when they are placed in a magnetic field.
It is proposed that this forgotten aspect of electromagnetism
lies at the root of the 1922 Stern-Gerlach experiment which
exposed a fundamental duality in silver atoms.
Abstract.
It is widely believed that electricity and magnetism were
united by James Clerk-Maxwell in the nineteenth century. In
his 1865 paper "A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic
Field" [1], Maxwell substituted the quantity "Displacement
Current" into Ampère's circuital law and he obtained
the electromagnetic wave equation. Displacement current is
generally believed to incorporate Gauss's law and so it would
appear that Maxwell had successfully united electrostatics with
electromagnetism.
Maxwell's physical
explanation for displacement current began in terms
of tangential stress on the electrical particles in his
sea of molecular vortices and it later developed into dielectric
linear polarization current. Maxwell was on the right
tracks when he considered the tangential stress on the electrical
particles in his vortex sea but he went wrong when he later
ignored his molecular vortices to concentrate on the dielectric
aspect of the aether.
There exists a tangential
quantity that might be accurately described as "Angular
Displacement Current" which exists perpendicular to linear
polarization current and which has an identical mathematical
form. Maxwell mistakenly interpreted displacement current
in electromagnetic radiation to refer to linear polarization current,
when in fact it should more accurately refer to angular displacement
current. Angular displacement current is a rotational phenomenon
and it will be concluded that electromagnetic radiation is
a gyroscopic phenomenon involving the coherent plane polarized
propagation of rotations (including precessions) and also the longitudinal
propagation of centrifugal pressure.
(This paper is meant as a replacement of the previous
one entitled: "The Four States of the Electric Sea".)
Abstract.
The aether alone cannot explain electromagnetism.
In order to explain electromagnetism, we need
to have a sea of aether vortices. In order
to have a sea of aether vortices, we need to have electrical
particles in the sea. It is the 'Electric Sea'
of electrical particles that shapes the aether
into vortices and causes the aethereal forces to manifest themselves
in the particular guise of electromagnetism. The
distinction between the aether and the electric sea, and
the relationship between them has not been discussed since
the time of James Clerk-Maxwell. This paper aims to clarify
the relationship between the aether and the electric sea. The
gyroscopic solenoidal alignment of the electric sea can reverse
a mutually attractive gravitational/electrostatic force into
a mutually repulsive electrostatic force. The gravitational and
electrostatic forces arise out of pure aether hydrodynamics.
New revised version: 14th March 2007
With a whole new section added (V) about the Earth's
Magnetic Field.
- - - - -
May 2007 - New important contributions from
F.D. Tombe to the theory of the aether.
Abstract.
One of Maxwell's original equations was
the equation for simple harmonic motion. It will be shown
how this forgotten equation can be reconciled with the double
helix theory of the magnetic field to show that
the famous equation E=mc² is actually Newton's equation
for the speed of sound in a solid.
Abstract.
Kepler's law of areal velocity is mathematically
equivalent to the Lorentz force. This provides
the link between Gravity and Magnetism. We learn
how gravity is an irrotational aether flow that is permeated
with tiny swirling sinks that siphon the aether away from
the larger sink. These tiny swirling sinks are stacked on top of
each other in their axial planes so as to form the double helixes
that constitute Faraday's lines of force. The magnetic permeability
represents the areal density in the equatorial plane of these
vortices and hence it represents the flux density of a bundle of
Faraday's lines of force measured perpendicularly to the lines.
Magnetic permeability and electric permittivity both represent a
leakage factor in the gravitational field.
Abstract.
An abominable by-product of the modern relativity
era is the widely circulated notion that a magnetic field
is the relativistic component of the electric field.
This idea arises out of applying the Lorentz transformation
to Heaviside's versions of Maxwell's equations. The result
yields both the Biot-Savart law and the Lorentz force along
with the relativistic conversion factors.
This article aims to demonstrate that the Lorentz
transformation of the Maxwell/Heaviside equations,
as regards producing the vXB component of the Lorentz
force, is merely doing what a Galilean transformation would
also do. It is restoring the convective component that
was part of Maxwell's original fourth equation, and which Heaviside
and Gibbs took away in 1884.
This article also demonstrates that the Biot-Savart
law is a solution to Maxwell's equations independently
of the Lorentz transformation.
- - - - -
June 2007 - Two new interesting contributions
from F.D. Tombe.
Abstract.
When a magnet is rotated, the v X
B component of the Lorentz force will not be invoked
on a nearby stationary test particle. The ∂A
/∂t component of the Lorentz force will however
be invoked provided that the axis of rotation does not coincide
with the magnetic axis.
Faraday's interpretation of the null electromagnetic
effect for the special case of a magnet rotating on its
magnetic axis was that the magnetic field does not rotate
with it. In this respect Faraday was correct, but he missed
out on the real significance of the scenario. The real significance
is that the vX B force is not invoked by
a rotating magnet irrespective of whether or not the magnetic
field is caused to rotate, and hence the velocity term
v cannot be considered to be measured relative to the
magnetic field. The velocity term in v XB must
be measured relative to something else, and since v
is zero in the case scenario, that something else is clearly
not rotating when a magnet rotates on ANY axis.
Faraday did in fact view a magnetic field in terms
of physical and very real lines of force, but his mistake
was that he failed to distinguish between the magnetic
field itself and the physical medium in which the magnetic
field is embedded. Maxwell interpreted Faraday's lines
of force as a solenoidal arrangement of molecular vortices in
the aether. Maxwell's sea of molecular vortices can in turn
be interpreted as an electric sea of rotating electron positron
dipoles. See "E=mc² and Maxwell’s Fifth Equation"
at point M in this same Forum .
The magnetic field is in fact a double helix solenoidal
alignment of the electron positron dipoles of the electric
sea. Hence the magnetic field can be rotating in a wave like
fashion through the electric sea when the electric sea itself
is not rotating. This point can be illustrated in reference
to the 1925 Michelson-Gale experiment.
Despite the fact that the Earth's magnetic field
rotates with the Earth, the Michelson-Gale experiment
detected a relative rotation of the luminiferous medium
in relation to the Earth's diurnal motion. This would
be further evidence to suggest that the electric sea does
not rotate with a magnet, irrespective of the orientation of
the rotation axis, and irrespective of whether or not the
magnetic field is rotating.
Abstract.
It is suggested that much confusion has been
caused in modern physics by failure to distinguish different
coordinate frame origins within different equations.
- - - - -
July 2007
Abstract.
Gravity and light are two different manifestations
of aether flow. A study of the derivation of the famous equation
E = mc², using Maxwell's equation for radiation pressure,
explains the link between mass, energy, and aether. This
allows us to conclude that electromagnetic waves must be
accompanied by an effective flow of mass.
The main difference between gravity and light is the
fact that gravity is a radially accelerating inflow of
aether that imparts its acceleration to particles, whereas
light is a tangential curled flow of aether that swirls
from vortex to vortex at a constant root mean square (rms)
speed. Gravity will therefore affect the path of a light beam
by superimposition of aether velocity, and light will
cause pressure on physical objects.
- - - - -
October 2007
Abstract.
A battery is a
source of energy. As such it contains pressurized aether
and it will weigh marginally less when it has expired. An
electric circuit acts like a pipe. When a battery is connected
to a circuit, aether accelerates linearly through the circuit
causing linear acceleration of the charge carriers within
the wire. The pressure in the system will cause the aether
to leak sideways from the wire and expand into the space beyond,
giving rise to a magnetic field.
Bernoulli, Maxwell and Tesla all believed that space/aether
is rendered into tiny whirlpools. The magnetic field
will now be explained in terms of these tiny aether
whirlpools.
Abstract.
In order to undermine the idea of a luminiferous
aether, it has been argued that a physical medium for the
propagation of light would necessarily cause friction which
would eventually cause the planetary orbits to collapse.
It will now be demonstrated how a dense electron-positron
sea actually contributes towards Kepler's laws of planetary
motion as opposed to undermining them.
The planets stay up in their orbits because of centrifugal
force. It will be shown how this centrifugal force actually
occurs in the shears lines of the electron-positron
sea where friction might otherwise have been expected
to occur.
- - - - -
Seven
more papers , November and December
2007
Abstract.
The purpose of this paper is to illustrate, by
examining various rotational scenarios, that the cyclonic
behavior in the atmosphere and in the ocean currents
cannot be explained by the conventional Coriolis force
approach. Instead, it must be explained by fine-grain Coriolis
force in the Earth's magnetic field.
25th April 2008 - The following is a new revised version of the
previous paper. We keep both
versions for history's sake:
Abstract.
The Coriolis force is generally considered to be
an artifact of viewing moving objects from a rotating frame of
reference. This article examines the extent to which the Coriolis
force may in fact be real in relation to its role in determining
the cyclonic behaviour in the atmosphere and the ocean currents,
since these very real effects cannot be explained purely in terms
of an artifact.
Abstract.
All atomic and molecular matter possesses a net negative charge that accounts
for gravity. Negative charge can be explained hydrodynamically in terms of
mutually attracting aether sinks.
In this article, we equate aether with vitreous fluid. When aether is compressed
into a material body, this will linearly polarize the internal electron-positron
dipoles and any other internal dipoles. The polarized dipoles then take the
form of a kind of knot in which there exists intersecting circular orbits.
This knot effect invokes the centrifugal lock mechanism which blocks the aether
inflow. The excess aether pressure will then penetrate into the space beyond
the body, hence leading to the linear polarization of the surrounding electron-positron
dipoles. We then say that the body is vitreously charged.
When a body has its internal aether pressure reduced, this will open the
microscopic gravity sinks wider and the body will become more strongly charged
negatively. Increased aether inflow leads to an increased polarization of
the surrounding electron-positron dipoles. In this case, the polarization
is opposite to that in the pressurized scenario. If the centrifugal pressure
in the surrounding polarized dipoles leads to a repulsion effect which overrides
the attraction effect of the inflow, we then say that the body is resinously
charged.
Two vitreously charged bodies will repel each other and two resinously charged
bodies will repel each other, whereas a resinously charged body and a vitreously
charged body will attract or repel each other depending upon which is the
stronger. The overall negative charge in the universe favours attraction in
the latter scenario.
When a magnet is rotated against its own magnetic axis,
precessional electromagnetic radiation will be emitted
in every direction. The impedance of the magnetic field
will require an input torque to maintain the rotation.
We will have a situation in which aether flows into the magnet
from a power source and gets distributed into the fine-grain
vortex satchels that comprise the surrounding electric sea. The rotating
magnet is therefore playing the role of an Archimedean screw
which irrigates the grains of the surrounding electric sea with
aether.
Archimedes' principle can be applied in the electric
sea to explain paramagnetic attraction and diamagnetic
repulsion [1]. This is based on a hydrodynamical force
derived by James Clerk-Maxwell and based on the concept of
a sea of tiny molecular vortices. The force in question derives
from a magnetic field intensity gradient in the steady state.
It will now be shown that such a gradient in the steady
state can only be compatible with the double helix theory
of the magnetic field if the variable quantity is the magnetic
permeability which has traditionally been assumed to
be constant for a given medium. It therefore follows that
the speed of light will vary with the magnetic flux density
of a steady state magnetic field.
A further connection between the vorticity of a magnetic
field and the speed of light extends this idea generally to the
fact that the speed of light will vary with magnetic flux density.
[Note of the Editor: As far
as this article is concerned, it seems interesting
to recall a paper by
Rocco Vittorio Macrì,
"The magnetic field as
a particular current of ether: a proposal of experiments
on its possible interaction with light" , which
was published in Episteme N. 4 (Sep. 2001).
]
Charge is ultimately aether pressure or aether tension, and aether
hydrodynamics leads us directly to the Lorentz force. This approach to electricity
does however pose a major riddle. It follows from aether hydrodynamics that
two sinks will mutually attract each other, whereas laboratory experiments
demonstrate that two kinds of electric charge exist, and that like charges
mutually repel in both cases. This article examines how a sea of tiny aether
vortices might act under certain circumstances so as to invoke fine-grain
centrifugal force and reverse the mutually attractive property of large sinks.
Abstract.
When the switch of an electric circuit is turned on, the
immediate effect is that the pressurized
aether from the power source arcs
across the shortest gap from the output terminal to the return
terminal. An electric circuit is instantaneously
created and this begins the process of
polarizing the electron-positron dipoles in that
immediate region. As the dipoles become polarized, their
opposing internal electric fields will impede
further aether flow and so the aether will
start to flow wide of that impeded region.
This effect progresses wider and wider until the entire
region enclosed within the electric
wire is polarized, and the current is
actually flowing totally within the wire.
This article discusses the speed at which the linear
polarization effect moves through the space
enclosed within the circuit wire.
Abstract.
There seems to be disagreement within the scientific
community as to whether or not Bernoulli's Principle explains
why aeroplanes fly. It will be explained below that
aeroplanes fly for the singular reason that the air pressure
under the wings is greater than the air pressure above the
wings.
- - - - -
More papers from January 2008.
If we consider space to be dynamical, aether hydrodynamics
yields four fundamental forces. These four forces are
divided into two groups of two. We have the rotational (or
tangential) forces, and we have the irrotational (or radial)
forces. Bernoulli, Maxwell and Tesla all believed that space/aether
is rendered into tiny whirlpools. As such we need to make a further
distinction between forces that arise from aether hydrodynamics
on the large scale, and forces that arise from the fine grain vortex
aether hydrodynamics on the microscopic scale.
New revised versione: 18th May 2008
Abstract.
The most important thing of all about Kepler's law of
areal velocity is the fact that it eliminates vorticity from curl-free
space. As such, no Coriolis force will ever act on free unbonded trajectories
in a gravitational field.
The official position in modern science is that the Coriolis
force is merely a fictitious force that arises when we view a motion
from a rotating frame of reference. This is clearly wrong and it is
not what Gaspard-Gustave Coriolis himself had in mind.
The tangential deflections and artificial circular motions
that are observed from rotating reference frames are not Coriolis force.
They are purely fictitious effects that bear some resemblance to the
Coriolis force. To obtain real Coriolis force we need to have actual
curl. We need hydrodynamics.
Hydrodynamics is all about elements of a fluid that are
moving relative to the larger body of that fluid. We can actually observe
the cyclones in the atmosphere from outer space and this suggests that
real Coriolis force must be involved since these effects are not merely
an artifact of observing them from any particular reference frame.
For real Coriolis force to occur, this means that the
inter-atomic and inter-molecular bonds within the fluid must involve
forces that are not subjected to Kepler's law of areal velocity. In
other words, the orbital systems within atoms and molecules must possess
vorticity.
We have all seen the sinkless vortices that exist in
turbulent air and turbulent water. These sinkless vortices are parallel
in principle to the helical motion associated with charged particles
moving in a magnetic field. The only conclusion that we can draw is
that molecules in motion relative to their neighbours must invoke the
real fundamental vXH Coriolis force on each other, where H is vorticity.
In a static fluid we would expect that stability will
occur as a result of an equilibrium between the inverse square law
force and the repulsive centrifugal force which arises from the rotating
constituent molecules. In a dynamic fluid in which elements of the fluid
are moving relative to other elements of the fluid, we should additionally
expect that the vXH Coriolis force will be involved.
Since a gravitational field is essentially just a weak
electric field, it will be discussed how thunderclouds are
acting like capacitors by siphoning aether from the
radial gravitational inflow. It will further be suggested
that auroras are gravitationally powered fluorescent lights
which operate on the gaseous discharge principle when the
magnetic field is at an optimum angle.
New revised version: 11th February 2008
Abstract.
The electron-positron sea impedes the flow of aether due to
the fact that the electron-positron dipoles become linearly
polarized and hence induce a back EMF. A capacitor in an electric
circuit can completely block the flow of electric current,
yet the evidence of fluorescent lights and cathode ray tubes
indicates that electric current can actually flow quite easily
in the electron-positron sea. This would imply that the impeding
effect of a capacitor does not appear to be entirely due to the
dielectric space between the capacitor plates. It would seem
as though the major impeding effect actually takes place inside
the conducting material when the conducting circuit is broken.
The breaking of the circuit seems to be the crucial factor in both
blocking the flow of electric current and also in converting the
conducting material into an excellent dielectric.
This might be explained if we consider electric current
to be primarily a flow of dynamic and compressible vitreous
aether. When a conducting circuit is broken, the aether gets
absorbed and blocked by the electrical particles inside the conducting
material since they cannot leave the conducting material to
jump across the gap. This state of affairs would occur if the electrical
particles were dielectric. In a closed circuit they would flow
freely with the aether, but if their path became blocked they
would stretch like a spring and oppose the applied electric field.
In a metal, these particles are probably electron-positron dipoles.
The absorption of aether in a broken electric circuit
leads to what has been referred to as 'the barrier potential'.
Abstract.
Planetary orbital theory tells us that if an object
at the Earth's surface possesses a horizontal speed of 8km/sec,
it should be weightless. It therefore follows that if we
spin a disc to an angular velocity such that large amounts
of its mass possess horizontal speeds in excess of 8km/sec,
that disc should levitate. There is as yet no experimental evidence
to suggest that centrifugal force in any way undermines the force
of gravity on a free falling spinning object that is undergoing
only vertical motion as a whole. The absence of spin based levitation
may be explained by the rotationally elastic sponge effect
of the electron-positron sea which absorbs all large scale vorticity.
The corollary of this is that if large scale vorticity
is absorbed into the fine-grain of the electron-positron sea,
then we should expect this effect to manifest itself as a magnetic
field. In looking for evidence that large scale spinning objects
generate a magnetic field we turn our attention to the planet Saturn.
Saturn's magnetic axis, its rotation axis and the rotation axis
of its rings all coincide exactly. Even if we don't find such a perfect
alignment with the other planets, the case of Saturn alone should
leave us in no doubt that planetary magnetic fields are primarily
caused by the rotation of the planet.
(New revised version: 28th August 2008)
Abstract.
Gravity, cathode rays, and bolts of lightning share one important
feature in common. They are all manifestations of aether flow. Gravity is
a tension associated with aether that is flowing into a sink, and since
it acts equally on all particles within a body, the acceleration due to
gravity does not depend on the inertial mass of the body that is undergoing
the acceleration.
Cathode rays on the other hand can heat a body, charge a body,
and cause a body to accelerate. In the latter case, the inertial mass of
the body is a relevant factor in deciding the acceleration that will be induced
in that body by the incident cathode rays.
It will be concluded that cathode rays are a pressurized flow
of aether and that inertial mass is a capacity to absorb aether pressure.
New revised versione: 18th May 2008
Abstract.
Officially the AC transformer involves no capacitor theory.
It is explained purely as an electromagnetic device. A step-up transformer
increases the voltage and decreases the current in the secondary circuit.
The low current in the secondary circuit is desired in order to minimize
resistive losses as it travels large distances across the countryside.
Electromagnetic waves will oscillate perpendicularly in and out from
the wires and cannot therefore be involved in the energy transfer process
since they are moving in the wrong direction by ninety degrees.
So there is clearly some important feature missing from
the explanation for electrical energy transfer. How does such a small
current carry so much power and cause such a dangerous tendency to
arc?
The answer lies in Bernoulli's Principle as applied to
aether hydrodynamics. In the primary circuit, kinetic energy is high
and potential energy is low. In the secondary circuit, kinetic energy
is low and potential energy is high.
Bernoulli's Principle can be satisfied by using 1/2LI²
for the kinetic energy and 1/2CV² for the potential energy. But
this means officially introducing capacitance.
The enormously high pressure (erroneously referred to
as tension) in the secondary wires and the tendency of the electric
current to arc to Earth is evidence of a very high capacitance. It
will now be suggested that capacitance is in fact the main factor involved
in the lossless transmission of electrical power.
New Revised version: 18th March 2008 - 20th April 2008
Abstract.
Modern classical mechanics has failed to explain the
preferred direction of spin and the reversal torque in the
rattleback. This is because three of the hydrodynamical aethereal
forces are denied, and the relevant torque is probably to be
found amongst these three forces.
The three denied aethereal forces are the centrifugal
force (G2), the Coriolis force vXB (G3), and the angular ∂A/∂t
force (G4). The vXB force and the ∂A/∂t force occur
in tandem on the fine-grain level in electromagnetic induction.
On the large scale, G3 accounts for the force that prevents a pivoted
gyroscope from toppling over. On the fine-grain level G2 accounts
for magnetic repulsion, and on the large scale it accounts for why
the Moon doesn’t fall to the Earth.
Equation (5) in Maxwell's 1861 paper "On Physical Lines
of Force" will be examined in order to try and ascertain which
of the G forces might be responsible for the torque that brings
a spinning rigid body into line with its preferred axis of symmetry
and also with its preferred direction of spin if it has one.
Inertia is generally understood to be that tendency of a body
to continue in its state of uniform motion unless acted upon by
an external force.
This is a very limited Cartesian way of looking at the
situation. The general situation can be understood entirely
within the context of centrifugal force.
5th May 2008 -The following is a new
revised version of the previous paper. Once again we
keep both versions
for history's sake...
J2' (New) - The Faraday Paradox and Newton's Rotating Bucket
Abstract.
Inertia is generally understood to be that tendency of a
body to continue in its state of uniform motion unless acted upon by
an external force.
This is a very limited Cartesian way of looking at the situation.
The general situation can be understood within the context of centrifugal
force. Inertia is centrifugal force in irrotational fields.
Centrifugal force in turn is one mutually perpendicular aspect
of a more general convective force of the form vXω which acts
in magnetic fields and in the cyclonic phenomena in the oceans and
the atmosphere. In general therefore, inertia is vXω where
ω is the angular velocity of the aether at the point in question
and v is the linear velocity of the particle or fluid element.
(Previously revised versions: 31st March 2008
- 20th April 2008)
New revised version: 13th July 2008
Abstract.
During a collision, momentum is always conserved.
The large scale kinetic energy on the other hand, may or may not
be conserved.
When kinetic energy on the large scale is conserved
during a collision, we say that the situation is matched. It will
be concluded that a matched collision involves only a large scale
pulse of aether with a prodigious speed that is many orders of magnitude
greater than the speed of light, and probably even instantaneous.
An unmatched collision on the other hand will involve both a large
scale aether pulse as well as a microscopic particle compression
wave with a finite speed in the order of the speed of sound.
This aether pulse, which we will call a vitreous pulse,
is a compression wave of aether involving an actual net aether flow
that moves through a rigid body and causes large scale acceleration.
This large scale acceleration is due to an aethereal force which
we will call G5.
More papers from April 2008.
Abstract.
The magnetic field is solenoidal, yet the equation
for the magnetic field indicates the existence of sources. This
paper shows how a double helix arrangement of sinks and sources
can resolve this dilemma. Faraday's lines of force, while being solenoidal
on one scale, contain within them a double helix array of electrons
and positrons which accounts for the Coulomb force of attraction between
two unlike magnetic poles.
Abstract.
It is suggested that the magnetic vector potential
A and the electric current density J are effectively one
and the same thing. They both represent a flow of aether. As
such we can show that the full expression for centrifugal force becomes
grad (ρv²) where ρ is aether density. This expression
confirms the close link between centrifugal force, kinetic
energy, and repulsion pressure .
Abstract.
Gravity is a radially inflowing electric current
described by the momentum equation A = J = ρv, where ρ is
aether density and v is the aether field velocity given by the escape
velocity formula.
The aether (or vitreous electricity) is space
itself, and in the unstressed state its density will be zero.
In the stretched state, such as in the case of aether flowing into
a sink, it will become rarefied and its density will be less than
zero. Conservation of aether energy in an irrotational sink of spherical
symmetry tells us that the density of the aether in this case will
be given by the formula ρ = −k/r.
As such we are left to conclude that negatively charged
particles are actually rarefactions in the aether. This article
will discuss the extent to which fine-grain centrifugal pressure
inside atomic and molecular matter will undermine the tendency for
gravitational mass to be negative.
New revised version: 9th June 2008
New revised version: 19th August 2008
Abstract.
A combined expression for Coriolis force and centrifugal force
of the form vXω can be obtained by differentiating a velocity vector
with respect to time. It will be discussed how the Coriolis force arises
when v and ω are independent of each other, and how the centrifugal
force is an outward radial effect which occurs when v and ω are directly
related to each other.
Abstract.
The Lorentz force contains a convective vXH term
which it has been assumed up until now is a Coriolis force. It was shown
in an earlier paper that the centrifugal force, grad(A.v), should also
be present in the Lorentz force but that it is missing.
It will now be suggested that the vXH term in the Lorentz
force may in fact be the general convective force and that it refers
to centrifugal force in the irrotational case when it applies to the force
on a current carrying wire, whereas it refers to Coriolis force in the
rotational case when an electric current is induced in a wire that moves
through a magnetic field.
- - - - -
News papers from August 2008:
New revised version: 19th August 2008
Abstract.
It is widely believed that centrifugal force does not
exist. It will now be shown that centrifugal force does exist and that
it is caused by a build up of aether pressure that in turn results from
congestion in the gravity sinks. This congestion is in turn caused by
vorticity in the aether, which is in turn caused by moving particles cutting
at right angles across aether flow.
(New revised version: 28th August 2008)
Abstract.
In earlier articles of this series, electrostatic repulsion in connection
with vitreous and resinous charge has been associated with fine-grain centrifugal
pressure in the linearly polarized electronpositron sea. Magnetic repulsion
has also been associated with finegrain centrifugal pressure in the magnetized
electron-positron sea, but the major difference between the two cases is
that an increase in magnetization results in an increase in vorticity H,
whereas an increase in linear polarization does not result in an increase
in vorticity H. This article takes a closer look at the linear polarization
mechanism for rotating electron-positron dipoles and concludes that the internal
opposing force involves a centrifugal aether pressure that is induced as
a result of the electron and the positron coming closer together for part
of their mutual orbit.
Abstract.
The screw effect was known to the ancients. It employs
the principle that a surface reaction at an angle can make an applied
force undergo a right angle turn. The screw is a helix, and wherever we
see a perpendicular swivel in conjunction with a helix, we must suspect
the hidden hand of the Coriolis force to be operating behind the scenes.
T2 - Areal Velocity, Coriolis Force, and Vorticity
Abstract.
In previous articles of the series it has been stated that
Kepler's law of areal velocity means that there is no vorticity in the gravitational
field. This article seeks to elaborate on the above assertion.
_____________________________________________________________